Multivitamin

 

• A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found a trend towards 6% reduction in all-cause mortality across primary prevention trials (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.00) (2013).

• The COSMOS-Mind trial found that daily multivitamin-mineral (MVM) supplementation for 3 years significantly improved global cognition (mean z = 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12; P = .007) compared to placebo (2022)

• The Physicians' Health Study II found that daily multivitamin use was associated with a modest but significant 8% reduction in total cancer incidence (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.998; P=.04) (2012).

• WHI study found that postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer taking multivitamin had 30% lower breast cancer mortality risk compared to non-users (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55, 0.91) (2014).

• The 2022 study found no association between post-diagnosis multivitamin use and mortality in colorectal cancer survivors. (all-cause MV-HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.11; colorectal cancer-specific MV-HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.35)

Multivitamin-multimineral supplementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2013)

Background: Multivitamins are the most commonly used supplement in the developed world. Recent epidemiologic findings suggest that multivitamin use increases the risk of mortality.

Objective: We aimed to determine whether multivitamin-multimineral treatment, used for primary or secondary prevention, increases the risk of mortality in independently living adults.

Design: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Multiple electronic databases were systematically searched from March to October 2012. Randomized controlled primary or secondary prevention trials were considered for inclusion. Eligible trials investigated daily multivitamin-multimineral supplementation for ≥1 y. Cohorts described as institutionalized or as having terminal illness (tertiary prevention) were excluded. The number of deaths and the sample size of each study arm were extracted independently by 2 researchers. Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis, which generated a total pooled sample of 91,074 people and 8794 deaths. These trials were pooled in a meta-analysis, and the outcomes were expressed as RRs and 95% CIs.

Results: The average age of the pooled sample was 62 y, and the average duration of supplementation was 43 mo. Across all studies, no effect of multivitamin-multimineral treatment on all-cause mortality (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.02) was observed. There was a trend for a reduced risk of all-cause mortality across primary prevention trials (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.00). Multivitamin-multimineral treatment had no effect on mortality due to vascular causes (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.09) or cancer (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.04). No statistical evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias was observed.

Effects of cocoa extract and a multivitamin on cognitive function: A randomized clinical trial. (2022)

Introduction: Dietary supplements are touted for cognitive protection, but supporting evidence is mixed. COSMOS-Mind tested whether daily administration of cocoa extract (containing 500 mg/day flavanols) versus placebo and a commercial multivitamin-mineral (MVM) versus placebo improved cognition in older women and men.

Methods: COSMOS-Mind, a large randomized two-by-two factorial 3-year trial, assessed cognition by telephone at baseline and annually. The primary outcome was a global cognition composite formed from mean standardized (z) scores (relative to baseline) from individual tests, including the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status, Word List and Story Recall, Oral Trail-Making, Verbal Fluency, Number Span, and Digit Ordering. Using intention-to-treat, the primary endpoint was change in this composite with 3 years of cocoa extract use. The pre-specified secondary endpoint was change in the composite with 3 years of MVM supplementation. Treatment effects were also examined for executive function and memory composite scores, and in pre-specified subgroups at higher risk for cognitive decline.

Results: A total of 2262 participants were enrolled (mean age = 73y; 60% women; 89% non-Hispanic White), and 92% completed the baseline and at least one annual assessment. Cocoa extract had no effect on global cognition (mean z-score = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.08; P = .28). Daily MVM supplementation, relative to placebo, resulted in a statistically significant benefit on global cognition (mean z = 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12; P = .007), and this effect was most pronounced in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease (no history: 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; history: 0.14, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.31; interaction, nominal P = .01). Multivitamin-mineral benefits were also observed for memory and executive function. The cocoa extract by MVM group interaction was not significant for any of the cognitive composites.

Discussion: Cocoa extract did not benefit cognition. However, COSMOS-Mind provides the first evidence from a large, long-term, pragmatic trial to support the potential efficacy of a MVM to improve cognition in older adults. Additional work is needed to confirm these findings in a more diverse cohort and to identify mechanisms to account for MVM effects.

Highlights: COSMOS-Mind was a large simple pragmatic randomized clinical trial in older adults conducted by mail and telephone. The trial used a two-by-two factorial design to assess treatment effects of two different interventions within a single large study. We found no cognitive benefit of daily cocoa extract administration (containing 500 mg flavanols) for 3 years. Daily multivitamin-mineral (MVM) supplementation for 3 years improved global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function in older adults. The MVM benefit appeared to be greater for adults with cardiovascular disease.

Multivitamins in the Prevention of Cancer in Men The Physicians' Health Study II Randomized Controlled Trial (2012)

Context Multivitamin preparations are the most common dietary supplement, taken by at least one-third of all US adults. Observational studies have not provided evidence regarding associations of multivitamin use with total and site-specific cancer incidence or mortality.

Objective To determine whether long-term multivitamin supplementation decreases the risk of total and site-specific cancer events among men.

Design, Setting, and Participants A large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Physicians' Health Study II) of 14 641 male US physicians initially aged 50 years or older (mean [SD] age, 64.3 [9.2] years), including 1312 men with a history of cancer at randomization, enrolled in a common multivitamin study that began in 1997 with treatment and follow-up through June 1, 2011.

Intervention Daily multivitamin or placebo.

Main Outcome Measures Total cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), with prostate, colorectal, and other site-specific cancers among the secondary end points.

Results During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.2 (10.7-13.3) years, there were 2669 men with confirmed cancer, including 1373 cases of prostate cancer and 210 cases of colorectal cancer. Compared with placebo, men taking a daily multivitamin had a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of total cancer (multivitamin and placebo groups, 17.0 and 18.3 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.998; P = .04). There was no significant effect of a daily multivitamin on prostate cancer (multivitamin and placebo groups, 9.1 and 9.2 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.09; P = .76), colorectal cancer (multivitamin and placebo groups, 1.2 and 1.4 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.17; P = .39), or other site-specific cancers. There was no significant difference in the risk of cancer mortality (multivitamin and placebo groups, 4.9 and 5.6 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .07). Daily multivitamin use was associated with a reduction in total cancer among 1312 men with a baseline history of cancer (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = .02), but this did not differ significantly from that among 13 329 men initially without cancer (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02; P = .15; P for interaction = .07).

Conclusion In this large prevention trial of male physicians, daily multivitamin supplementation modestly but significantly reduced the risk of total cancer.

Multivitamin and mineral use and breast cancer mortality in older women with invasive breast cancer in the women's health initiative (2014)

Multivitamin use is common in the United States. It is not known whether multivitamins with minerals supplements (MVM) used by women already diagnosed with invasive breast cancer would affect their breast cancer mortality risk. To determine prospectively the effects of MVM use on breast cancer mortality in postmenopausal women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, a prospective cohort study was conducted of 7,728 women aged 50–79 at enrollment in the women's health initiative (WHI) in 40 clinical sites across the United States diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer during WHI and followed for a mean of 7.1 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Use of MVM supplements was assessed at WHI baseline visit and at visit closest to breast cancer diagnosis, obtained from vitamin pill bottles brought to clinic visit. Outcome was breast cancer mortality. Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer mortality comparing MVM users to non-users were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Analyses using propensity to take MVM were done to adjust for potential differences in characteristics of MVM users versus non-users. At baseline, 37.8 % of women reported MVM use. After mean post-diagnosis follow-up of 7.1 ± 4.1 (SD) years, there were 518 (6.7 %) deaths from breast cancer. In adjusted analyses, breast cancer mortality was 30 % lower in MVM users as compared to non-users (HR = 0.70; 95 % CI 0.55, 0.91). This association was highly robust and persisted after multiple adjustments for potential confounding variables and in propensity score matched analysis (HR = 0.76; 95 % CI 0.60–0.96). Postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer using MVM had lower breast cancer mortality than non-users. The results suggest a possible role for daily MVM use in attenuating breast cancer mortality in women with invasive breast cancer but the findings require confirmation.

The Associations of Multivitamin and Antioxidant Use With Mortality Among Women and Men Diagnosed With Colorectal Cancer (2022)

Background

Colorectal cancer survivors often use multivitamins and other over-the-counter dietary supplements, but evidence is limited regarding their potential associations with mortality.

Methods

This prospective analysis included women and men from the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort who were cancer-free at baseline (1992 or 1993) and diagnosed with colorectal cancer through June 2015. Detailed information on multivitamin use, vitamin C supplements, and vitamin E supplements was self-reported on questionnaires at baseline, in 1997, and every 2 years thereafter. Pre- and postdiagnosis data were available for 3176 and 2006 colorectal cancer survivors, respectively, among whom 2116 (648 from colorectal cancer) and 1256 (242 from colorectal cancer) died. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

Among colorectal cancer survivors, 49.7% and 58.5% reported multivitamin use before and after diagnosis, respectively (vitamin C use before and after diagnosis: 27.8% and 28.1%; vitamin E use before and after diagnosis: 27.5% and 29.4%, respectively). There were no statistically significant associations of pre- or postdiagnosis multivitamin use with all-cause, colorectal cancer-specific, or noncolorectal cancer mortality. Vitamin C was also not associated with any mortality outcomes. However, prediagnosis vitamin E use was associated with a non-statistically significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence intervals = 0.96 to 1.23) and all other noncolorectal cancer mortality (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence intervals = 0.97 to 1.31).

Conclusions

These results suggest that multivitamin use before or after diagnosis is not associated with mortality in colorectal cancer survivors. However, vitamin E use may be associated with increased risk of mortality and merits further investigation.

Postdiagnosis multivitamin use was also not associated with mortality (all-cause MV-HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.11; colorectal cancer-specific MV-HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.35; and all other causes MV-HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.12) (Table 2).